Accepted to AACL 2026 · Main Conference

Information-seeking across societies

The curious case of curiosity across cultures.

We evaluate whether language models ask questions like people do across cultures—and find that today’s models compress a diverse world of curiosity into a narrower, more Western pattern.

Angana Borah1 Zhijing Jin2,3,4 Rada Mihalcea1

1University of Michigan · 2University of Toronto · 3Vector Institute · 4MPI for Intelligent Systems

?
Argentina · society & culture

What are the 15 most famous nations on earth as of today?

India · environment

Do you care for the environment?

Italy · belief

Where did the Trinity come from? I don't see it in the Bible.

Philippines · identity

Why do people have misconceptions about our culture?

18countries
16topics
6language models
3cultural benchmarks

Intelligence is not only about having answers.

It is also about knowing what to ask.

Questions reveal what people notice, what they consider uncertain, and which paths they choose to explore. Those habits are shaped by culture, social norms, and education.

Yet most cultural evaluations of LLMs test answers. That misses the step before an answer: whether a model seeks the right context—or silently fills the gap with its own default assumptions.

→ Most benchmarks ask Does the model know?
? We ask instead What does the model seek?

IQUEST

Three views of how humans and models ask.

IQUEST—Information-seeking QUestion Evaluation across SocieTies—compares human-authored questions with culturally prompted model questions.

01

How questions are phrased

Compare ambiguity, rhetorical devices, open-endedness, and cohesion.

Linguistic style
02

What people choose to ask about

Compare country-level rankings across shared topics, from family to politics.

Topic preference
03

What the patterns mean

Ground the differences in cultural values, context, and education systems.

Social science

The central finding

Models flatten cultural diversity.

Human question-asking patterns vary more across countries. Model questions cluster more tightly and align most closely with patterns expressed in Western countries.

Cross-country variation Humans vary 2.7× more Standard deviation across countries; higher means more cross-cultural variation.

The narrower model spread is evidence of cultural flattening—not cultural universality.

After adaptation 43% smaller alignment gap Macro-average distance from human linguistic patterns; lower is better.

Adapter-based training closes much of the gap while preserving the base model’s flexibility.

01

Humans are more diverse

People’s questions show more variation in style across countries than model-generated questions.

02

Content and style differ

Models diverge from humans in both how they phrase questions and which topics they prioritize.

03

Prompts are not enough

Cultural personas help, but do not fully reproduce country-specific information-seeking patterns.

From curiosity to capability

Better questions lead to better cultural reasoning.

When models ask brief follow-up questions before deciding, accuracy improves across three different cultural tasks. Information-seeking helps a model pause, recover missing context, and avoid defaulting to a familiar assumption.

Culture-aware systems should not merely memorize more facts. They should learn when—and how—to ask.
Accuracy on downstream cultural benchmarks Base model vs. best information-seeking result
Direct answerInformation-seeking

Accuracy (%). Information-seeking uses the best reported variant for each benchmark.

AACL 2026 · Main Conference

What a model asks shapes what it can understand.