⚠ This page and the underlying benchmarks contain examples of toxic and offensive stereotypes, used for the purpose of studying and mitigating bias.
Abstract
While reasoning generally improves fairness in recent large language models (LLMs), failures persist. In this work, we identify a failure mode, deductive stereotyping, in which models apply population-level statistical regularities to individual cases, producing logically coherent yet socially biased inferences. We provide a statistical interpretation of this phenomenon. To steer models toward fairness-aware reasoning, we propose a reasoning-time injection framework. We further introduce Fair-GCG to systematically discover effective injection phrases. Injection phrases discovered by Fair-GCG improve performance across multiple fairness benchmarks, generalize from smaller to larger LLMs, improve reasoning-level fairness, reduce bias in open-ended generation, and transfer to real-world fairness-sensitive tasks.
Key contributions
- Deductive stereotyping. We name and characterize a dominant failure mode in fairness-sensitive reasoning, and give it a Bayesian/statistical interpretation of when and why group priors shift individual-level conclusions.
- Reasoning-time steering. A mid-generation injection framework distinct from post-hoc self-reflection that nudges models toward fair inferences while they reason.
- Fair-GCG. The first adaptation of GCG-style discrete prompt optimization to bias mitigation. Discovered phrases outperform existing bias-mitigation methods and transfer across models, datasets, and scales.
BibTeX
@article{deng2026fair,
title = {Wait, am I Being Fair? Characterizing Deductive Stereotyping and Mitigating It with Fair-GCG},
author = {Deng, Naihao and Zhu, Yilun and Nwatu, Joan and Scott, Clayton and Mihalcea, Rada},
journal = {arXiv preprint},
year = {2026}
}